当然,虽然说不能兼容,但是对于为什么不能兼容还是需要解释一下的,其关键在于这么个选择器的问题:input[type=radio]:before。:beofre这个伪类选择器在主流浏览器中可以在P,span,div等标签插入一些式样,但是在input中就不行,索性chrome支持这一特性,而本实例也正是围绕着一特性进行开发。其他不多说,直接上代码和截图。
效果截图:
HTML代码:
<label for="test1">Test for test1 </label>
<input class="radio" type="radio" ID="test1" name="test" value="test1"/>
<label for="test2">Test for test2 </label>
<input class="radio" type="radio" ID="test2" name="test" value="test2"/>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<label for="check1">check1</label>
<input id="check1" name="check" value="check1" type="checkbox" class="checkbox"/>
<label for="check2">check2</label>
<input id="check2" name="check" value="check2" type="checkbox" class="checkbox"/>
<label for="check3">check3</label>
<input id="check3" name="check" value="check3" type="checkbox" class="checkbox"/>
<label for="check4">check4</label>
<input id="check4" name="check" value="check4" type="checkbox" class="checkbox"/>
input[type=radio]{
font-size:1em;
visibility: hidden;
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
width: 1em;
height: 1em;
}
input[type=radio]:before{
font-size:1em;
top:12%;
display: inline-block;
position: absolute;
content:' ';
visibility: visible;
height: 1em;
width: 1em;
display: block;
background: url("../img/no.png") no-repeat;
background-size: 1em 1em;
}
input[type=radio]:checked:before{
font-size:1em;
content:' ';
visibility: visible;
height: 1em;
width: 1em;
background: url("../img/yes.png") no-repeat;
background-size: 1em 1em;
}
input[type=checkbox]{
font-size:1em;
visibility: hidden;
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
width: 1em;
height: 1em;
}
input[type=checkbox]:before{
top:12%;
display: inline-block;
position: absolute;
content:' ';
visibility: visible;
height: 1em;
width: 1em;
display: block;
background: url("../img/checkbox_no.png") no-repeat;
background-size: 1em 1em;
}
input[type=checkbox]:checked:before{
content:' ';
visibility: visible;
height: 1em;
width: 1em;
background: url("../img/checkbox.png") no-repeat;
background-size: 1em 1em;
}版权声明:本文为博主原创文章,未经博主允许不得转载。
原文地址:http://blog.csdn.net/u010571913/article/details/46969049